Going up the google rankings

Following the last round of upgrades and changes by Google, experts in the field of search engine optimisation have been mulling over the effect of the changes.

One of the main areas of interest has been that sites that have a more diversified pattern of high ranking links from other sites to their own site are doing better.

The feeling is that Google is that if you have links coming in from specific pages of a web site, they are more likely to be real, (rather than people just saying “hey can I swap page links with you) if they come from a specific page.

So if I writing about different styles of dancing and I link from my article to a specific page on someone else’s site which exemplifies the point I am making, then that link in to that site is of extra value.

Now if I am writing for a page with a page ranking of four (which is good and means you are probably getting 200,000 visits or more in a month) that is going to help the site I link to.

There’s a further point – sites that regularly produce new content and then receive links from other sites turn out to be the most successful.

So it is good to be in touch with people who might link to your site, and encourage them to do so – especially if they will directly link into a page.

Work of this nature is part of the Velocity programme within Hamilton House.  If you would like to know more please visit www.velocity.ac or call me on 01536 399 013.

The three steps to marketing that many firms forget

I wrote the other day about the fact that many of the people who talk to me about marketing don’t have an overall plan.   Their focus is entirely on one element of the issue: the media.

This is, I believe due to the fact that many companies that sell mailing lists push their mailing and email lists to the exclusion of the rest of marketing – leading to a view that if you just get the medium right, everything else will be fine.

To my mind marketing is not complex, but it does consist of three inter-connected sections, and if one ignores any of these sections the resultant marketing is far less effective than it might otherwise be.

To make this dead simple the three part approach can be seen as

1,  Making the product’s benefits plain, and making it easy to understand and easy to get going

2.  Taking the message to potential customers in a way that makes them read your message and instantly understand what you are talking about.

3.  Staying in touch with existing clients, ensuring they are happy with you, getting them to pass the message on to others, and encouraging them to return to you to buy more.

This is what we set out to do with Velocity – the programme where we work with clients on a month by month basis.    We would never claim that this is some form of incredibly complex marketing – it is not.  But because of the pressures of everyday work it is easy to forget the three stages and just focus on one of them.   If you find this approach interesting do have a look at http://www.velocity.ac/business.html which sets out some of our ideas – or give me a call on 01536 399 013 and I’ll be happy to talk this through.  No obligation, no charge – always happy to chat.

How to increase the effectiveness of your marketing…

Establish a plan.

That sounds stupid and obvious, but it is the one thing that (in my experience) many companies that are struggling a little at the moment, don’t do.

I am not a believer in a detailed plan stretching on for the rest of the year which can only be changed in the case of emergencies, but I do believe in knowing the sort of approach one is adopting.

So, for example, here’s a simple plan (it doesn’t apply to everyone but it is an example of the sort of thing that I mean).

  1. Send out emails to get people to request a free sample, a trial run, a catalogue, a report, or anything else free.
  2. Take those people’s email addresses and drop them into a program that does bulk emailing.
  3. Email those people every week with more information, advice, guidance, tips, and of course adverts relating to your product.
  4. Based on the success of a), do further promotions of free materials in order to get success.

That’s a very simple plan, and obviously not one that is viable for every business, but it is a plan that can work, and work very well. Of course, make sure that your data you collect is secure with a quick download of a suitable antivirus and installing it on your work computer. It would really put a stop in the works of instigating your marketing plan if your potential customers'/advocates' personal emails are hacked. If in doubt, get more advice on building an email list from as many different sources as possible.

There are hundreds of variations, and hundreds of different types of plans, but in my view the key issue is often not a case of which plan, but the fact that there is no consistent marketing plan at all.

But here’s a challenge – if you would like to talk about developing a marketing plan, and if you have a spare 15 minutes, give me a call. In complete confidence we can have a chat and I’ll give you my thoughts. Consider it a free consultancy offer. (I regret to say that sometimes I am out of the office or in meetings, but if I am not here I will call you back – promise!)

You never know – it might result in you getting one little nugget of information that really could change the way you see marketing.

And if not, you’ve only lost 15 minutes.

Why do people stop reading emails?

A set of studies examined by the web site Marketing Vox has revealed that the prime reason that people stop reading and ultimately unsubscribe from email lists has little to do with concerns about privacy but a lot to do with a thorough dislike of irrelevant emails.

While it might be amusing to receive the occasional piece (as I did today) that says:

Forgive my indignation if this message comes to you as a surprise and may offend your personality for contacting you without your prior consent and writing through this channel. I got your contact from a professional database found on the internet while searching for a reliable and honest person that will assist me to safeguard fund into an account. I was divinely inspired to pick your name among all other names found in the database.

in the end such rubbish becomes a bit dull, and one tries to get rid of it.

So once again we can see that the key is how one writes – make it interesting so that people want to read it – even occasionally – and they will stay on your email list. But if you become tedious or repetitive they won’t.

It is not the case that each and every email has to appeal to the reader – but the following rules really do seem to apply…

  1. Some of the emails really do have to appeal to the readers.
  2. All of the emails need to be written in a way that makes the reader feel interested in staying on the list – even if this email is not really relevant.
  3. There needs to be a personal element in the emails – and that does not mean using mechanical personalisation systems. It means recognising the interest of the people on your list.

As always if you want to talk about this, do give me a call on 01536 399 013 or drop me an email at Tony@hamilton-house.com

How often you mail is not the key issue

One of the more curious differences between email and direct mail is the way in which many firms consider the issue of “how often to send.”

In the briefest terms, many companies have tended to use the post quite rarely because of worries about cost, whereas they tend to email quite regularly (especially if they have their own email list).

In my view it is possible to email people very regularly (this email service reaches you several times a week for example) and engage with the recipient – just as it is possible to get people to subscribe to a weekly magazine through the post or to read a daily paper.

The key therefore is neither the medium, nor the regularity, but the content.

Of course there can be a situation in which you can mail or email people so often that they stop reading, but most firms are nowhere near this.   They get unsubscribes from the list not because they are sending out too much material but because the material they send out is not interesting enough.

I have often been known to unsubscribe from an email list after just one or two emails simply because they are wholly irrelevant to me, while I stay with other lists that supply me with news on a daily basis because every week or so I find something I really want to read.

Therefore the focus of attention must be on this simple issue: if you are mailing me, either through the post or through email, how do you get me to know that I want to read this article?

The solution has to be through

a) the headline (and subject line in an email)

b) the opening few words

c) the way the piece develops via the opening words of each paragraph (this on the basis that most readers skim articles trying to pick up the key points quickly).

d) the variation in the way you write.

Therefore all of the thought has to go into the text – as in, why am I writing this, what do I want the reader to do at the end, how am I going to get the reader to do this?

There’s a lot of discussion on topics around this on www.theory.bz but if you want to start somewhere there is http://www.theory.bz/factor1.html

Alternatively give me a call on 01536 399 013 and I will be pleased to talk any aspect of this through with you.

Send the same email again and again?

A singularly bizarre campaign has just been launched which tells advertisers that through the simple expedient of sending the same email every week to the same people for a year sales will grow.    The company running the campaign claim that they find that they get an 80% increase in response rate through this ploy.

This goes against everything that I have discovered through 10 years or more of experimenting and sharing information with members of this news group.   Repeating emails tends to lead to one thing – requests to be removed from the list.

I suspect the 80% growth comes about because it is based on zero marketing before the experiment (the advert is unclear on this).

So if we assume that the company was selling 100 products a year through no advertising (purchases from past buyers) and now is selling 180 having been advertising, then there has been that growth of 80%.

But the cost could be that people have unsubscribed, (assuming of course that the company puts an unsub button in, as they are suppose to) or have set up message rules to block the company.

A certain suspicion also arises about the campaign in that the web site that enquirers are sent to has a page rank of zero, despite a registered start date of ten years ago.  That suggests that maybe the company had no sales at all – although one cannot really have an 80% increase on zero can one?  (My maths goes funny when it involves zeros and infinity.)

Anyway, there’s no proof and no evidence offered – but just in case you see the ad, I would urge extreme caution.  In all my experience, the best way to make email to work is to keep changing it.

Tony Attwood

When is the best moment to send an email

Barely a week goes by without a new report emerging on the topic of when the best time is to send out an email.

Is there a day of the week, a time of day when you get the best response?

The whole argument is based around the notion that people do notice when an email comes in and that this influences their response.

If I take myself as a sample of one, yes I am a little more trigger happy on a Monday morning, as I tend to have emails in the in-box which have arrived since I closed the machine down at 5pm on Friday.  And since most of my customers don’t write to me over the weekend, I have the feeling that what is in the in-box is rubbish.

But for the rest of the week, I think I take everything as equal.  I know my Australian clients are liable to write overnight (from my perspective in the UK).  And I know that for reasons that have never become clear to me, some of our clients work until 7 in the evening – or even later.

So I am really not sure that timing of incoming emails makes a difference to me at work.

As for my home email, if I wake up early I do sometimes take a peek before I go to work.  Otherwise I generally have a look when I get home in the evening.

But despite my survey of one, we have retained in this office a view that Friday afternoon is no good for emailing.   But by a curious anomaly in the way we work, (i.e. a cock up) we have actually been advertising products that a different department of Hamilton House has available to sell on Friday afternoon (because these adverts have been held back while we have sent out our clients adverts through the week).

And would you believe it, we’ve been getting terrific sales.

So, what do we conclude?   Quite probably that unless you have clear evidence that emails sent out at a particular time to a particular audience do better or worse than others, don’t follow guidance as to when is the best time.

Not least because everyone else will be following that guidance, and so that time (whenever it is) will start to become the moment everyone sends out emails.

Hamilton House can distribute your emails for you, and also has available a state of the art program for transmitting emails, if you want to do it yourself.  Do give us a call if you want to know more.

The one key marketing ploy in difficult times is…

Experimentation.

Unfortunately for many companies the reverse seems to be the case – with firms saying, “let’s do the same as before” when advertising isn’t working.  But doing the same as before generally doesn’t work – whether it is in difficult times or not.

Of course if you are in one of those companies that does find that doing the same as before in terms of marketing really does make it all happen for you, that’s fine – you don’t need Hamilton House.

But if not, then experimentation is the key.

The great thing about direct mail and email marketing is that it is possible to experiment without causing any problems.  You can send out a modest number of mail shots or emails and if the advertising doesn’t work, then fine, you try something else.

Indeed if you have your own list of potential customers and a system set up to ensure that your list is not blocked by recipients, then experimental marketing through email can be a very modestly priced approach.

If you would like to discuss ways of building a list of potential clients, of running your own transmission software, or of sending emails through HHM, or indeed if you want to talk about the experiments we’ve undertaken which have produced great results, please do get in touch.

01536 399 013.

Tony Attwood

Why do some items go into the spam box?

Issues at the recipient’s end

  1. All Internet Service Providers have some filtering going on and they will handle incoming emails in their own way.  Emails caught by such a system will either never be delivered to the individual, or will be put in a spam box on the server.   The settings of these filtering systems can be affected by the recipient organisation, and so an administrator may well change the settings for the whole school or company, if he or she feels that there is too much spam around.   Since no one sees the results of these changes they can be fairly destructive for incoming emails, and are generally the source of the problem where someone says, “I never get your emails”.

  1. Many spam boxes learn from the action of the email account holder.  Thus if the recipient moves a number of items into a spam box the system can “learn” about these items, and automatically look for words, phrases, addresses, links etc and put these in the spam box.  Generally you should never drop something into a spam box unless you know you don’t want anything else from that address, or with those words in it.  It is much safer to hit delete.  For emails with an unsubscribe button, hitting the unsub button is usually the most effective way forward.

  1. Most email programs (Outlook etc) have message rules sub-programs which allow the user to build in rules about certain emails.  A typical rule might be “if the email contains a particular phrase, put it into the spam box”.  The problem with this is twofold.  One is that it is easy to forget rules that one built a year ago.  The other is that the spam box can start learning and expanding the rules.

  1. Grey listing is used by many systems.  This means that if the system does not recognise an address, it rejects the email and puts it in spam.  It will then recognise the address if several more emails from the same address arrive – and eventually it stops blocking and allows the email through.  Quite why grey listing exists is beyond me, but it does.

  1. Anti-virus programs do contain their own email checking programs, although generally these are hidden away in the “advanced” settings, and few people change them from the standard settings.  Many of these programs use “Heuristics” (experience-based techniques that mean that as the system learns what emails are not wanted, and which emails have dangerous attachments), so it tends to block them or push them into spam boxes without the user every knowing why.

Issues at the sender’s end.

  1. Speed.  The speed at which emails are sent out can affect the delivery rate, and for this reason some senders (such as Hamilton House) run their systems at a very slow speed.

  1. Bounce rate.   Companies that clean up their lists very regularly have a greater chance of getting their emails through.  This affects people who buy in lists and then just use them over and over again.  Gradually servers to which their emails are directed become resistant to all email from that source and will block it.  This can particularly affect schools, where their servers are run via individual local authorities which monitor all the mail going into all the schools in the area.

As we can see from this, the cause of emails not arriving or being put into a spam box, are mostly with the recipient.  There are things that the sender can do, but much of the time it is a recipient issue.

You can’t get £100,000 worth of trade out of a single email promotion?

Until a couple of weeks ago I would have said no, you can’t get £100,000 worth of trade out of a single email promotion, but now we’ve done it.

A promotion of around 7000 emails – some directed to the organisation in general, some to the individual email address of the person most likely to be interested – has generated a turnover of in excess of £100,000 for our client.

Of course it would be lovely if I could say that we can do this all the time – and I have to be honest and say we don’t get this level of success all the time.

But what we can say is that we are still pushing the response rates of email up, through exploring the way in which emails are written.  I can also add that every week that goes by teaches us something new about email marketing and the way in which emails need to be written to push response rates up.

The simple answer to the question of how to write emails that work really well, is through the production of emails that are conversational and unusual, rather than ones that simply announce what is avaialble.

Which raises the question – why isn’t everyone doing it, when it is that successful?

It is an interesting point.  Despite the fact that there is no evidence that I know of in which a single short-run email can actually do any harm to a company, there remains a feeling that “we couldn’t say that” or “that’s not really us”, and it is this feeling that pushes companies back into the world of traditional announcement advertising.

If you would like to explore how this conversational approach to advertising could work for you, in your industry, do give me a call on 01536 399 013.  No obligation and no charge of course – but I do think you will find it beneficial to take a look at the issue.

Tony Attwood